Re: Move from Sourceforge

Ian Silvester <[email protected]> Fri, 30 Oct 2015 15:18:01 -0400
Newsgroups gmane.comp.web.privoxy.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 2015-10-30 10:36, Fabian Keil wrote:
> Ian Silvester <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> I have today learnt that Sourceforge is blocked by uBlock's default
>> ruleset, ostensibly because of the unpleasant badware they push
>> aggressively when one downloads any genuine files.
>>
>> I was in discussion with the author of a fairly good security guide for
>> OS X who currently promotes the Homebrew installer for Privoxy. This is
>> inferior to ours for a number of reasons, not least that Privoxy is
>> executed using the interative user account that was used when installing
>> it. He is however unwilling to alter his guide to promote the 'official'
>> binary package due to the problem detailed in the first paragraph.
> Given that the OS X packages come with OpenPGP signatures
> (a security guide could mention) that seems to be a strange
> position to me.
As I understand it it's that if readers have followed his guide they'll 
have installed uBlock and hence would be blocked from visiting 
Sourceforge at all.
> Anyway, it if helps, we could also make the OS X binaries available
> from the hidden service page (http://jvauzb4sb3bwlsnc.onion/) which is
> outside SourceForge's control and provides end-to-end encryption (on top
> of the signature files).
This doesn't route for me - I assume it depends upon Tor? As you'll know 
OS X users are (typically) non-technical and won't have Tor configured. 
I consider myself fairly technically adept and yet I don't use Tor.

I'll consider temporarily hosting the OS X binary packages myself for 
those who won't or can't visit Sourceforge.
>> I think the time has come for us to move, no? Fabian I know you've
>> already put some thought into this - do you have a preferred project
>> host, going forward?
> As far as I'm concerned, moving away from SF is long overdue.
>
> Unfortunately my impression is that self-hosting is currently the only
> long-term option as all the project hosting services I'm aware of seem
> to fail to satisfy most of the requirements from:
> http://ijbswa.cvs.sourceforge.net/viewvc/ijbswa/current/TODO?view=markup#l413
>
> After talking to various self-hosting developers, I believe the
> requirements could be mostly met by using Bugzilla for bug reports,
> Mailman for mailing lists, Gitolite and Gitweb for version control stuff
> and nginx (or Privoxy itself) as webserver.
>
> If there are better options, I'd be interested to hear about them.
>
> If nobody objects, I can try to get things moving by looking for a hoster
> that is willing to sponsor (at least) one server in exchange for being
> mentioned on the website and a contract with SPI Inc. or Zwiebelfreunde e.V.
> to get the tax benefits.
I agree with this approach entirely. You are right in the TODO wishlist, 
and self-hosting would seem the only way to ensure a secure and safe 
future for the project.
>> All input welcome, however a priori I would have thought github would be
>> the obvious choice?
> In my obviously biased opinion, Github is a pretty poor choice for a
> free software project with a reasonable amount of users with strong
> feelings about (software) freedom, privacy and security.
>
> Github seems to fail at requirements 2 (a show stopper for me), 4, 5,
> 6, 7, 8 and 9 and I'm unsure about the remaining ones. IIRC, Github also
> lacks support for commit mails with diffs included.
>
> Having said that, there's no reason why all the Privoxy-related things
> have to be hosted on the same hosting service.
>
> If you are comfortable with using Github for Mac OS X development
> and none of the other OS X developers and contributors object,
> you could migrate the OS X stuff at your earliest convenience
> (and migrate again if/when Github starts to follow SF's "lead"
> or better options become available).
>
> After all, Github currently isn't worse than SF and OS X users
> are unlikely to complain about Github being a proprietary service
> anyway ...
On reflection I'd prefer not to fragment our offering. Please delegate 
any setup items to me that you need to once the host is chosen; I'm keen 
to help share the load in any way I feasibly can.

Cheers,

Ian



>
> Fabian
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ijbswa-developers mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ijbswa-developers

-- 
My PGP public key 
<http://diem.serveftp.net:8080/IanSilvesterPGPPublicKey.asc>.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
Ijbswa-developers mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ijbswa-developers