Re: Move from Sourceforge
Ian Silvester <[email protected]> Fri, 30 Oct 2015 15:18:01 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.privoxy.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 2015-10-30 10:36, Fabian Keil wrote: > Ian Silvester <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I have today learnt that Sourceforge is blocked by uBlock's default >> ruleset, ostensibly because of the unpleasant badware they push >> aggressively when one downloads any genuine files. >> >> I was in discussion with the author of a fairly good security guide for >> OS X who currently promotes the Homebrew installer for Privoxy. This is >> inferior to ours for a number of reasons, not least that Privoxy is >> executed using the interative user account that was used when installing >> it. He is however unwilling to alter his guide to promote the 'official' >> binary package due to the problem detailed in the first paragraph. > Given that the OS X packages come with OpenPGP signatures > (a security guide could mention) that seems to be a strange > position to me. As I understand it it's that if readers have followed his guide they'll have installed uBlock and hence would be blocked from visiting Sourceforge at all. > Anyway, it if helps, we could also make the OS X binaries available > from the hidden service page (http://jvauzb4sb3bwlsnc.onion/) which is > outside SourceForge's control and provides end-to-end encryption (on top > of the signature files). This doesn't route for me - I assume it depends upon Tor? As you'll know OS X users are (typically) non-technical and won't have Tor configured. I consider myself fairly technically adept and yet I don't use Tor. I'll consider temporarily hosting the OS X binary packages myself for those who won't or can't visit Sourceforge. >> I think the time has come for us to move, no? Fabian I know you've >> already put some thought into this - do you have a preferred project >> host, going forward? > As far as I'm concerned, moving away from SF is long overdue. > > Unfortunately my impression is that self-hosting is currently the only > long-term option as all the project hosting services I'm aware of seem > to fail to satisfy most of the requirements from: > http://ijbswa.cvs.sourceforge.net/viewvc/ijbswa/current/TODO?view=markup#l413 > > After talking to various self-hosting developers, I believe the > requirements could be mostly met by using Bugzilla for bug reports, > Mailman for mailing lists, Gitolite and Gitweb for version control stuff > and nginx (or Privoxy itself) as webserver. > > If there are better options, I'd be interested to hear about them. > > If nobody objects, I can try to get things moving by looking for a hoster > that is willing to sponsor (at least) one server in exchange for being > mentioned on the website and a contract with SPI Inc. or Zwiebelfreunde e.V. > to get the tax benefits. I agree with this approach entirely. You are right in the TODO wishlist, and self-hosting would seem the only way to ensure a secure and safe future for the project. >> All input welcome, however a priori I would have thought github would be >> the obvious choice? > In my obviously biased opinion, Github is a pretty poor choice for a > free software project with a reasonable amount of users with strong > feelings about (software) freedom, privacy and security. > > Github seems to fail at requirements 2 (a show stopper for me), 4, 5, > 6, 7, 8 and 9 and I'm unsure about the remaining ones. IIRC, Github also > lacks support for commit mails with diffs included. > > Having said that, there's no reason why all the Privoxy-related things > have to be hosted on the same hosting service. > > If you are comfortable with using Github for Mac OS X development > and none of the other OS X developers and contributors object, > you could migrate the OS X stuff at your earliest convenience > (and migrate again if/when Github starts to follow SF's "lead" > or better options become available). > > After all, Github currently isn't worse than SF and OS X users > are unlikely to complain about Github being a proprietary service > anyway ... On reflection I'd prefer not to fragment our offering. Please delegate any setup items to me that you need to once the host is chosen; I'm keen to help share the load in any way I feasibly can. Cheers, Ian > > Fabian > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > _______________________________________________ > Ijbswa-developers mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ijbswa-developers -- My PGP public key <http://diem.serveftp.net:8080/IanSilvesterPGPPublicKey.asc>. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Ijbswa-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ijbswa-developers