Re: WebSocket in Privoxy

Fabian Keil <[email protected]> Thu, 23 Mar 2023 09:11:27 +0100
Newsgroups gmane.comp.web.privoxy.user
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Fabian Keil <[email protected]> wrote on 2023-03-23 at 09:00:52:

> Marek Küthe <[email protected]> wrote on 2023-03-21 at 12:48:19:
> 
> > Why should Firefox use `CONNECT`? Isn't the WebSocket handshake
> > performed with a `GET`?
> 
> You're right, unencrypted WebSocket requests don't need to
> use CONNECT requests when using a proxy (but can).

Actually I was right the first time:

| WebSocket protocol client implementations try to detect whether
| the user agent is configured to use a proxy when connecting to
| destination host and port, and if it is, uses HTTP CONNECT method
| to set up a persistent tunnel. 
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WebSocket>

Fabian

_______________________________________________
Privoxy-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.privoxy.org/mailman/listinfo/privoxy-users
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 833 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=a4Az
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----