Re: WebSocket in Privoxy
Fabian Keil <[email protected]> Thu, 23 Mar 2023 09:11:27 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.privoxy.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Fabian Keil <[email protected]> wrote on 2023-03-23 at 09:00:52: > Marek Küthe <[email protected]> wrote on 2023-03-21 at 12:48:19: > > > Why should Firefox use `CONNECT`? Isn't the WebSocket handshake > > performed with a `GET`? > > You're right, unencrypted WebSocket requests don't need to > use CONNECT requests when using a proxy (but can). Actually I was right the first time: | WebSocket protocol client implementations try to detect whether | the user agent is configured to use a proxy when connecting to | destination host and port, and if it is, uses HTTP CONNECT method | to set up a persistent tunnel. <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WebSocket> Fabian _______________________________________________ Privoxy-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.privoxy.org/mailman/listinfo/privoxy-users
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 833 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEETzbBfzgWkTZUoehQaRgikYuiNxwFAmQcCa8ACgkQaRgikYui NxzqsQ//XIFcpAp7vIDuk1KGcDczZFt4E2tUKydxuPUW6Z379pzgMR57RgW8XYDO OeTfK6EZy6mh6A0mUMNW4u0GgY2Bt3vbVJW5o8QllMlQmEGwhl76IVQuEgLZFdbZ RG2WEWJ4v4KgO6GblDlB3PwTHEdt4VIIgO9CUX2xcqLCAuraLjg8kasL72EEojxh tmVxW5P0Xfb7UTWjZEwPH94xLBwFBxnYKg1kbpG7KrF6NJoPAKMmLbByEqd/hyby 9OxNO2Pe9eZK9CWR6ziTtg84dg++wxpVjtQYKuzCKeykWlQKtq99khQfT3tbzLPu sUn5oBQA4gvHNkej8ZQnMEm119xQWJt6pzXv1kAdEMD0u46nWdBveNndiQ1CoVYj lcmjGDWR4aABfiLg9loUbmEamc6Lga22yZNezJ59/zF4LChalAjhOLcu+qQfoN9O NjAD+LQ7AVsIBiBuys5/OQofzaSWiu1tqbZHdGhxWgFiuFnbZKWNfGQLacwCyKNU Y5fkVF+BBrAD/4kJLDvYcSVneF2rwbTIcGmBOjOr6RAGDW/yyxw2C2WXZ50O9sQI 8I+EbHLVOZ/ZcIr15K6ME3u5G8exVKvQcv2hx5+96m2raAx343MUy7jkidogZSjh dj/OnvHlFxMe/uDVrUz5fUnEH1tL/5TQ57s8kYo9UcZMZbxXwjw= =a4Az -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----