Re: Modify transparent mode
Lee <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.privoxy.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAD8GWsuX=EWkbeDYP63Dz4c6yfvJka8jKLuhtCoUDzediJGzrA@mail.gmail.com> |
On 2/4/19, Redback <[email protected]> wrote: > On 5/2/19 8:17 am, Lee wrote: >> On 2/3/19, Redback <[email protected]> wrote: >>> On 4/2/19 11:35 am, Redback wrote: >>>> On 4/2/19 12:34 am, Lee wrote: >>>>> On 2/3/19, Redback <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> Is there a way to modify transparent mode so as to also block tracker >>>>>> /ad domains from SSL request, privoxy is running on a DD-WRT router >>>>>> (ex-netgear router). >>>>> >>>>> Privoxy can't block things like >>>>> /(.*/)?js/hitbox >>>>> on SSL requests, but it can block hostname patterns like >>>>> .*tracking. >>>>> .*ad. >>>>> >>>>> And it's pretty easy to turn an ad blocker hostfile into a privoxy >>>>> action file - eg <.. snip example ..> >>>> >>>> G'day Lee >>>> >>>> Thank you for the feed back, I am aware the program has it short coming >>>> with regards to SSL issue, it just the hostname/domains that I wish to >>>> block, however, saying this, the privoxy program is running on the >>>> router only , not on any other device's or computers. Since TV's and >>>> etc >>>> now go through this proxy to protect my privacy since TV's are a very >>>> chatty device. I see in the logs, the request for non SSL hostname are >>>> blocked from time to time, and it seem to be a mix bag for SSL request >>>> as most time there is no SSL request in the logs, could this last part >>>> be related to having no setting in the network / proxies property box >>>> on >>>> any devices or computers themselves! All device get their IP by the >>>> router DHCP only. >> <.. snip config bits ..> >>> Let me expand on this earlier statement if I input IP and port 8118 into >>> the proxy setting on each computers or mobile devices then the SSL will >>> show up in the logs, there are other devices which don't have the proxy >>> interface to input into, so they skip the SSL block , there must be a >>> work around other than dnsmasq procedure. Yes - there should. I dunno what it is tho :( All I've come up with is running my own resolver & blocking DNS traffic from TVs etc. to the outside world. >> I've never used DD-WRT so maybe this >> https://forum.dd-wrt.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?p=769841 >> if you enable transparent mode? >> >> Regards, >> Lee >> > Thanks Lee > Believe me I have search threw and threw not just in that forum but > others also, yes, I have transparent mode running however, it only does > port 80 and not 443 which is a shame. Ill have to compliment it with > dnsmasq for privoxy short comings. I just saw a msg on the dns-ops mailing list about DNS privacy - this is a good read: https://blog.powerdns.com/2019/02/07/the-big-dns-privacy-debate-at-fosdem/ and if you use firefox https://hacks.mozilla.org/2018/05/a-cartoon-intro-to-dns-over-https/ tl,dr: maybe someday soon firefox will ignore your dns blocking & go straight to a cloud provider with encrypted dns requests. Regards, Lee