Re: Modify transparent mode

Lee <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.web.privoxy.user
Message-ID <CAD8GWsuX=EWkbeDYP63Dz4c6yfvJka8jKLuhtCoUDzediJGzrA@mail.gmail.com>
On 2/4/19, Redback <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 5/2/19 8:17 am, Lee wrote:
>> On 2/3/19, Redback <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> On 4/2/19 11:35 am, Redback wrote:
>>>> On 4/2/19 12:34 am, Lee wrote:
>>>>> On 2/3/19, Redback <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>> Is there a way to modify transparent mode so as to also block tracker
>>>>>> /ad domains from SSL request, privoxy is running on a DD-WRT router
>>>>>> (ex-netgear router).
>>>>>
>>>>> Privoxy can't block things like
>>>>> /(.*/)?js/hitbox
>>>>> on SSL requests, but it can block hostname patterns like
>>>>> .*tracking.
>>>>> .*ad.
>>>>>
>>>>> And it's pretty easy to turn an ad blocker hostfile into a privoxy
>>>>> action file - eg
   <.. snip example ..>
>>>>
>>>> G'day Lee
>>>>
>>>> Thank you for the feed back, I am aware the program has it short coming
>>>> with regards to SSL issue, it just the hostname/domains that I wish to
>>>> block, however, saying this, the privoxy program is running on the
>>>> router only , not on any other device's or computers. Since TV's and
>>>> etc
>>>> now go through this proxy to protect my privacy since TV's are a very
>>>> chatty device. I see in the logs, the request for non SSL hostname are
>>>> blocked from time to time, and it seem to be a mix bag for SSL request
>>>> as most time there is no SSL request in the logs, could this last part
>>>> be related to having no setting in the network / proxies property box
>>>> on
>>>> any devices or computers themselves! All device get their IP by the
>>>> router DHCP only.
>>   <.. snip config bits ..>
>>> Let me expand on this earlier statement if I input IP and port 8118 into
>>> the proxy setting on each computers or mobile devices then the SSL will
>>> show up in the logs, there are other devices which don't have the proxy
>>> interface to input into, so they skip the SSL block , there must be a
>>> work around other than dnsmasq procedure.

Yes - there should.  I dunno what it is tho :(   All I've come up with
is running my own resolver & blocking DNS traffic from TVs etc. to the
outside world.

>> I've never used DD-WRT so maybe this
>>   https://forum.dd-wrt.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?p=769841
>> if you enable transparent mode?
>>
>> Regards,
>> Lee
>>
> Thanks Lee
> Believe me I have search threw and threw not just in that forum but
> others also, yes, I have transparent mode running however, it only does
> port 80 and not 443 which is a shame. Ill have to compliment it with
> dnsmasq for privoxy short comings.

I just saw a msg on the dns-ops mailing list about DNS privacy - this
is a good read:
https://blog.powerdns.com/2019/02/07/the-big-dns-privacy-debate-at-fosdem/

and if you use firefox
https://hacks.mozilla.org/2018/05/a-cartoon-intro-to-dns-over-https/

tl,dr: maybe someday soon firefox will ignore your dns blocking & go
straight to a cloud provider with encrypted dns requests.

Regards,
Lee
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.