Re: Patch for simple walk caching
Pasi Savolainen <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.pyblosxom.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
* Wari Wahab <[email protected]>: > Patrick Hall wrote: > >>That site is very cool. He has some interesting extensions, as well: >> >>http://www.cs.cis.nagasaki-u.ac.jp/~narazaki/index.cgi/meaning-of-life/blosxom-and-friends >> >>Does a powerpoint-style presentation from normal entries. >> >> > Whoah, I don't have any access to mod_python enabled webserver, but last > I tried, the latest mod_python (3.0.3 at the time) and apache at the > time just refused to work with pyblosxom. And now he managed to get it > to work with a .htaccess file which looked like something I did a while > ago! Which means only two things: Either mod_python changed to be very > cgi-friendly, or pyblosxom changed to be mod_python friendly. Can anyone > explain? I think it's that Apache 2.0 mod_python is a bit friendlier. I had pyblosxom working on my workstation (has apache2), but couldn't get it to work on my webserver (that runs apache 1.3). FWIW, on my workstation I had .cgi hiding too, though that was a bit of an abuse. -- Psi -- <http://www.iki.fi/pasi.savolainen> ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/