Re: Funky caching

will guaraldi wrote:

> On Wed, 8 Dec 2004, Jesse Lawrence wrote:
>
>>
>> I am working on Roberto De Almeida's funky caching implementation in 
>> an attempt to fully integrate it with pyblosxom, handling newly 
>> posted comments and all.  It is my opinion (for what it's worth) that 
>> this should be the one and only static rendering mechanism for 
>> pyblosxom, because it's automatic (behind the scenes) and fairly 
>> elegant.
>
>
> I'm a little puzzled...  what do you mean by "one and only static 
> rendering mechanism"?
>
> /will
>
I mean that funky caching just happens, much like the original (at least 
I thought) idea of Pyblosxom (Blosxom);  you place a file in a 
directory, and it becomes a blog post.  It just happens.

To me, the current static rendering method (no offense) is contrary to 
the idea behind Pyblosxom.  Having to run a script after making a new 
post adds to the effort of posting.

Jesse

>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
> Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
> Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. 
> http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/
> _______________________________________________
> Pyblosxom-devel mailing list
> Pyblosxom-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pyblosxom-devel
>



-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. 
http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/