Re: WSGI wrapper for Pyblosxom
Bill Mill <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.pyblosxom.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Wed, 8 Dec 2004 16:56:22 -0600 (CST), will guaraldi <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, 8 Dec 2004, Bill Mill wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, 8 Dec 2004 15:55:20 -0600 (CST), will guaraldi > > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Wed, 8 Dec 2004, Steven Armstrong wrote: > >>> > >>> I forgot something. One would have to apply the attached patch to > >>> pyblosxom.py to get the whole thing working. > >> > >> > >> I can apply that now for PyBlosxom 1.1. I don't see it having any ill > >> effects with existing PyBlosxom functionality. > >> > >> Anyone opposed to this? > > > > I assume that you mean that you'll remove the addHttp( {'form'...}) from > > the blosxom_handler and move it to pyblosxom.cgi? > > > > I'm all for that. I actually just found a bug in my photo gallery caused > > by exactly that. It took me probably 2 hours to debug, because I was > > stupid. By all means, I support the change. > > I was talking about applying the patch to pyblosxom.py that Steven sent. > I wouldn't be moving the addHttp call anywhere--just adjusting it a bit. > I'm not sure what you're talking about. > > /will > You're right, I wasn't making sense. I have a tedency to do that. Nevermind what I said, strike it from the record. Peace Bill Mill bill.mill at gmail.com ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/