Re: python version
Bob Ippolito <bob-Zl9L/[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.pyblosxom.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Feb 25, 2005, at 8:56 AM, will guaraldi wrote: > > Well, I solicited comments and got back some interesting feedback. I > think we're fine with upping the required version of Python from 2.1 > to 2.2. It will inconvenience people, but it won't be cataclysmic and > as Bill Mill pointed out, it's possible we already require at least > 2.2. Hard to say, though. > > So that's my thinking on that. Barring any further conversation, I'm > going to change the requirement for the next version. Any thoughts? Is there any compelling reason not to just jump to 2.3? 2.3.0 was released on 7/29/2003, so it's been around for quite some time. -bob ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click