Re: pyblosxom future (1.3/2.0)
will guaraldi <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.pyblosxom.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Mon, 28 Mar 2005, Doug Ransom wrote: > > Well, the main reason in my opinion to move to 2.4 is so that the code > evolves in the best way possible, rather than being second-grade to > support legacy versions of python. I don't think many people running > pyblosxom are going to grumbly about upgrading to python 2.4. We have a user right now who's having problems with PyBlosxom 1.2's new requirement of Python 2.2. He's on a box that's running Debian stable and he doesn't have root access to it. It'd be interesting to quantify how many users this would affect. We can argue it either way, but it'd be better to figure out how to accurately or even semi-accurately poll our users. /will ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click