Re: twisted
will guaraldi <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.pyblosxom.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Tue, 29 Mar 2005, Steven Armstrong wrote: >> >> I totaly agree on this. I think it would generally be good to move from >> the "collection of scripts" design to a more "application" design. > > Additional note: > The above statement is based on my attempts writing a nevow-renderer for > Pyblosxom. The design of how callbacks are processed, and the way the > plugin system works, gave me some headaches with this. > > I think Pyblosxom does what it's ment to do, and does that well. But I > also think that it would be easier to extend/enchance it if their would > me more "well known interfaces" between the different parts of the > system. Well, what do you mean by "well known interfaces" between the different parts of the system? Can you give any examples? ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click