Re: twisted
Steven Armstrong <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.pyblosxom.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 03/29/05 21:27, will guaraldi wrote: > On Tue, 29 Mar 2005, Steven Armstrong wrote: >>> >>> I totaly agree on this. I think it would generally be good to move from >>> the "collection of scripts" design to a more "application" design. >> >> Additional note: >> The above statement is based on my attempts writing a nevow-renderer for >> Pyblosxom. The design of how callbacks are processed, and the way the >> plugin system works, gave me some headaches with this. >> >> I think Pyblosxom does what it's ment to do, and does that well. But I >> also think that it would be easier to extend/enchance it if their would >> me more "well known interfaces" between the different parts of the >> system. > > Well, what do you mean by "well known interfaces" between the different > parts of the system? Can you give any examples? > I found it difficult to write my nevow-renderer in a generically working way cause the plugin system is so flexible that you can do just about anything at any time from within a plugin. That ment that their could be special cases depending on what plugins are loaded. The result is that I can use the nevow-renderer but it's unlikely that anybody else, with only a slitely different setup, could run it. For example the comments plugin directly accesses the renderer's outputTemplate methods. It also changes the loaded templates on the fly. As I wanted to use a nevow-template and renderer, which work totally different than the standard engine, this made things difficult. There's no way I could have implemented this without hacking the comments plugin. It would have been much easier if plugins would not change or access the internals in such a way, and instead tell the core system to do that for them. If I have to hack plugins to work with changes made to the underlying system that's IMHO a sign that "well known interfaces" are missing. On the other hand, maybe I was just trying to do something that's totally incompatible with Pyblosxoms design. I don't know if this is a good example or if I was able to explains my thoughts well enough. cheers Steven ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click