Re: twisted

On 30-Mar-05, at PM 02:23, Steven Armstrong wrote:

> I agree that WSGI is important for Python web programming.
> Altough for me it doesn't really go far enough. I'ld prefer something
> like the Java Servlet spec, that is, a less bloated and pythonized
> variant. There's still so meny things missing in WSGI, like session
> handling and all.
>
> This is is one section where Pythons batteries are missing.

Well, I do believe that using the Webware framework is more of servlet 
style of web application programming. And since Webware's thread based 
(as opposed to twisted), coding pyblosxom to fit in Webware is easier. 
Runs faster than twisted too. I did a pyblosxom servlet in webware a 
long time ago. Didn't work as well as back then, pyblosxom cannot 
handle multiple simultaneous/concurrent accesses. Wierd things happen. 
Sometimes contents of entries can change, or data in the cache acts 
weird, etc.

Anyway, I'm not sure how well WSGI can wrap to Webware, but there is 
WSGIKit, described as "WSGIKit is an implementation of Webware, 
decomposed into WSGI middleware.", and unfortunately, I have no idea 
what that means ... yet :)



-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click