Re: pyblosxom future (1.3/2.0)
Erik Smartt <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.pyblosxom.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 05:33 +0100 (BST), Jim Hughes <[email protected]> wrote: > > ... I don't think many people running > > pyblosxom are going to grumbly about upgrading to python 2.4. > > Well, here's a grumble, the guys who host my site aren't even looking at > moving up from 2.2 yet. Same here. I think Debian stable uses 2.2 right? > Given > that Nokia haven't released the code for their port yet, I'm also stuck on > 2.2 on the phone unless I want to do a lot of porting work. A little off topic, but yes, we're sticking with 2.2.2 for now on Series 60 / Symbian. Given the choice of more native API's or updating the language, I picked more API's. Once the source is available, I suppose you could try applying patches to 2.4. But now that you mention it, I haven't even considered trying to run PyBlosxom on my phone ;-) --Erik ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by Demarc: A global provider of Threat Management Solutions. Download our HomeAdmin security software for free today! http://www.demarc.com/Info/Sentarus/hamr30