Re: Re: pybloxsom (fwd)
Bill Mill <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.pyblosxom.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Mar 31, 2005 10:34 PM, Wari Wahab <[email protected]> wrote: <snip nice art (wink wink) from wari> > > This is just a suggestion. In practise it can be hard to follow if a > developer checks out a wrong branch and checks in to HEAD (there is no > erm.. security in cvs) so developers have to be in sync on what to do, > there's no way to make HEAD read-only. > > But if developers just work of DEVEL, and a release technician does the > dirty work of merging to HEAD and creating the necessary branches, it > would be a solid system to work on. Bug fixes could just check out > PYBLOSXOM_1_2 branch and work on fixing bugs, tags as necessary if he > does a release from that point (no need to merge to HEAD here). > > So what say you? The question I have is, do we have somebody to serve as the brach maintainer? In other words, what does Will think about this? It sounds like a reasonable system to me. (I even think I understood the chart). Peace Bill Mill bill.mill at gmail.com ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by Demarc: A global provider of Threat Management Solutions. Download our HomeAdmin security software for free today! http://www.demarc.com/Info/Sentarus/hamr30