Re: pyblosxom web-site update

On Apr 9, 2005, at 10:42 AM, will guaraldi wrote:

> I haven't looked into it yet, but I suspect all the plugin changes 
> were made in non PYBLOSXOM_1_2 branches, so I'm going to have to get 
> the changes over to the PYBLOSXOM_1_2 branch.  What's our policy on 
> that? Should we be making these sorts of changes in the PYBLOSXOM_1_2 
> and PYBLOSXOM_1_1 branches and then merging them into HEAD?

I made my license changes in the DEVEL tag, but I just realized that I 
made some of my recent comments changes to HEAD.  I guess I think that 
for stuff that we are actively working on that has been agreed upon, 
like the licensing changes, we should probably do that in HEAD.  For me 
HEAD and DEVEL seem synonymous.  Branches should be used for highly 
experiment or potentially sweeping changes and should be integrated 
back into HEAD after some amount of review.  A lot of this would be 
easier under svn.

----
Ted Leung                          Blog: <http://www.sauria.com/blog>
PGP Fingerprint: 1003 7870 251F FA71 A59A  CEE3 BEBA 2B87 F5FC 4B42



-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click