Re: Porting to TurboGears

Well, I contend that at that point it's not really PyBlosxom.

However that brings to mind something I've been tossing around for a 
while.  I'm not sure what we should do with PyBlosxom after 1.3 and the 
flavour overhaul.  I was tossing around reworking plugins, but I think I'm 
just going to retire and do minor bug fixes if needed, but otherwise it's 
done.  The reason being that PyBlosxom isn't really architected well 
enough to work with other frameworks and applications (MoinMoin, Trac, 
WSGI, ...) and since there are so many other blogging utilities out there 
many of which fulfill user needs far better than PyBlosxom does, there's 
not much point in continuing PyBlosxom.

Any thoughts on that?

/will


On Tue, 13 Dec 2005, David Stanek wrote:
> 
> I am looking to write a blog under the TurboGears framework. One of my 
> options is to port PyBlosxom to TurboGears. I would first make it use 
> Kid as the template engine and then dive right in to using the 
> framework.
>
> Is there any interest it this type of activity?
>
> David


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems?  Stop!  Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the  web.  DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click