Re: Porting to TurboGears

On Tue, Dec 13, 2005 at 12:16:16PM -0600, will guaraldi wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Dec 2005, Blake Winton wrote:
> >I love the idea behind PyBlosxom, i.e. the file system determines the blog 
> >layout, and many of the plugins have functionality that is really useful.  Of 
> >course, I haven't needed it to do anything more than it already does for a 
> >while now, so switching into bug- fix mode wouldn't trouble me overly.
> >Of course, writing PyBlosxom-NG to fit into TurboGears/WSGI/Trac/etc would be 
> >a fun project as well.  I hope you all would contribute your collective 
> >experience to that project, if only in the form of "We tried this, and it 
> >didn't work out so well" emails.
> 
> I don't think re-writing PyBlosxom in TurboGears is a complex task to do. I'd 
> help out from an advice point of view if someone were to start that kind of 
> project.

Consider it started. I have been working on this a little bit today
already. I would like to have something done fairly quickly.

Once I get some work done I will find a place to put it (maybe on my
svn server). I would welcome any help.

David

-- 
GPG keyID #6272EDAF on http://pgp.mit.edu
Key fingerprint = 8BAA 7E11 8856 E148 6833  655A 92E2 3E00 6272 EDAF

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDnyikkuI+AGJy7a8RAtAgAKCg7VGXVagK0dahheSEIgu5EFMDIQCggk1G
Cy5t6n5CiWC/zEiaa1A4Suo=
=qHDX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----