Re: PyBlosxom 1.3 release candidate 1

will guaraldi <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.web.pyblosxom.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
The atom flavour that comes with PyBlosxom 1.3 is Atom 1.0 and works fine 
with the feedvalidator and doesn't require the w3cdate plugin.  I've been 
using it on my site for a month now.

http://feedvalidator.org/check.cgi?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.bluesock.org%2F%7Ewillg%2Fblog%2Findex.atom

So, I'm a little puzzled by what you're saying.  I guess I'd like to see 
your patch.

/will


On Wed, 4 Jan 2006, Michael Guntsche wrote:
> 
> Hi,
>
> I made some changes to the Atom flavour to make it Version 1.0 and 
> feedvalidator ready.
> I have one "problem" though. It needs the w3cdate plugin to create a valid 
> w3cdate in the header. Without it, the updated tag is empty and the 
> feedvalidator barfs. If you want I can send a patch against latest CVS.
>
> Kind regards,
> Mike


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems?  Stop!  Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the  web.  DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.