Re: PyBlosxom 1.3 release candidate 1
will guaraldi <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.pyblosxom.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
The atom flavour that comes with PyBlosxom 1.3 is Atom 1.0 and works fine with the feedvalidator and doesn't require the w3cdate plugin. I've been using it on my site for a month now. http://feedvalidator.org/check.cgi?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.bluesock.org%2F%7Ewillg%2Fblog%2Findex.atom So, I'm a little puzzled by what you're saying. I guess I'd like to see your patch. /will On Wed, 4 Jan 2006, Michael Guntsche wrote: > > Hi, > > I made some changes to the Atom flavour to make it Version 1.0 and > feedvalidator ready. > I have one "problem" though. It needs the w3cdate plugin to create a valid > w3cdate in the header. Without it, the updated tag is empty and the > feedvalidator barfs. If you want I can send a patch against latest CVS. > > Kind regards, > Mike ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click