Re: weblogsping.py error handling patch
will guaraldi <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.pyblosxom.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Wed, 30 Aug 2006, Blake Winton wrote: > > But wait, it's only 1.4 times slower to do an addition and a > try than just an addition, so just the try block runs at 0.4 > times the speed of an addition. It would be cheaper for us > to add a try block than it would to add a "+"... I agree that > a factor of 1.4 slowdown for the whole app would be a big deal, > but that's not what was being timed there. Bah. It was a bad hair day yesterday. I see what you're saying now and that makes sense. The actual try/except block is pretty efficient and isn't that big a deal. Turns out it even says that in the Python FAQ. I was confusing that with exactly what you thought I was confusing it with: try/except block with exceptions being thrown as opposed to doing things in a way where exceptions weren't being thrown. Thanks for hitting me over the head a few times. ;) /will ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642