Re: is anyone using return_folders in tools.Walk()?
"Will Guaraldi" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.pyblosxom.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 7/5/07, Ryan Barrett <pyblosxom-6sb6M7qyT/[email protected]> wrote: > hi all! is anyone using the optional return_folders parameter in the > tools.Walk() function? i'm considering a non-backward compatible change. i > found a couple uses on the web, beloq, and i've cc'ed their authors. i figured > i'd check here too. Personally, I think Walk is a wart. I'd like to remove it and replace it with a get_entries and a get_categories or something along those lines. There's a note at the very bottom of the TODO regarding this work. > return_folders defaults to false, which returns only files. if it's set to > true, only directories are returned. i'm planning to extend it so that both > files and directories can be returned. that's possible now by calling Walk > twice, but that stats all of the directories and folders twice, which is > inefficient. if you don't use a filestat cache, it can be noticeable on large > sites. Are you sure about that? I didn't think the stat'ing was done in tools.Walk. Walk will walk the directory tree twice, but I don't see it stat'ing things. /will ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/