Re: testing (was spambayes plugin, and other plugins)

Ryan Barrett wrote:
> On Sat, 8 Dec 2007, will wrote:
> 
>> Things that could be tested for increasing test coverage:
> 
> some of the most common plugins, like comments, are also good 
> candidates. tests for them would make me ecstatic, even if they're just 
> a start.

I don't know offhand how to go about testing plugins.  PyBlosxom doesn't 
provide any infrastructure for doing so.  Is that something we should 
add and if so, how should it work?  That's a good subject for a 2.0 
proposal.


>> I figure we're at 36% or so now, so bumping us up to 60% coverage is a
>> good jump.
> 
> absolutely! if you're going to include a coverage metric, you'll 
> probably also want to include instructions for measuring coverage. 
> (unless nose does that automatically?)

The README in the trunk talks about running nose tests with coverage.  I 
think I made the changes while you were writing up that test document.

/will

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
It's the best place to buy or sell services for
just about anything Open Source.
http://sourceforge.net/services/buy/index.php