Re: Running 2.0dev

David Pratt <fairwinds-KiPCJBMgASssA/[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.web.pyblosxom.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Ok. Thanks guys. I guess I am not so aware of the changes you are 
considering for rendering. I saw changes with regards to cache and read 
of some desire to make it more open to other template systems. What are 
you trying to solve with changes to rendering?

In the meantime, I'll study the code and decide what to do. I'll come to 
you to request commit access if I begin to use the code. Many thanks.

Regards,
David

will wrote:
> 2.0 isn't stable.  I'm still making a bunch of changes and the changes 
> definitely haven't been carried through to plugins.
> 
> If your expectation is for something stable with plugins you don't have 
> to mess too much with, I'd go with 1.4.3.
> 
> If your expectation is to help me finish 2.0 (hopefully sooner rather 
> than later), and help me flesh out idiot decisions I'm making with the 
> changes, I'd go with 2.0.
> 
> As a side note, I'm running my blog with the 2.0 branch, though I 
> haven't updated in a few months.  I was waiting until I figured my way 
> through the formatter changes and then carried those fixes through to 
> plugins that I use.
> 
> As another side note, there's no reason you can't run your blog with 
> 1.4.3 and help me test 2.0.  Grab it with svn checkout, follow the notes 
> in README and INSTALL, and then deploy it with instructions in the wiki. 
>  The easiest way to deploy locally without affecting anything is with 
> Paste:
> 
> http://pyblosxom.sourceforge.net/wiki/index.php/DeploymentPaste
> 
> 
> Mario Fernández wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I tried to use 2.0 a couple of weeks ago, but got a variety of  
>> problems, so I stayed with 1.4.3. For the plugins I usually take the  
>> last version though.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Mario
>>
>> On May 28, 2008, at 6:35 AM, David Pratt wrote:
>>
>>> Hi. I am thinking about hacking pyblosxom and don't want to waste the
>>> effort on legacy code. I see you are running 2.0dev for your own blog.
>>> Can someone tell me how volatile 2.0 is? Many thanks.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> David
> 


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.