Re: pyarchives_enhanced.py updated package

[after a long delay...]

On Fri, 4 Jul 2008, Klaus Trainer wrote:

> I thought about making pyarchives_enhanced available parallel to
> pyarchives.py. So users who don't want the Javascript functionality could
> still use plain old pyarchives.py, which by the way, is also easier to
> deploy. What do you think about it?

sure! sounds good. i've committed the contents of your
pyarchives_enhanced.tar.gz tarball largely as is. i made a few minor tweaks, 
and i took the liberty of adding the legal disclaimer to pyarchives.js and 
your name to the copyright both there and in pyarchives_enhanced.py.

one request: i'd like to see the common code in pyarchives.py and
pyarchives_enhanced.py enhanced. ideally, pyarchives_enhanced users would 
install both, and pyarchives_enhanced.py would enable itself, disable 
pyarchives.py, and reuse the common pieces.

-Ryan

--
http://snarfed.org/

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/