Re: PROBLEM with comments.py in current SVN

Ryan Barrett wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Jul 2008, Guntsche Michael wrote:
> 
>> Another question, since there have been a lot of changes in pyblosxom between 
>> 1.4 and 2.0 does it make sense to fork the plugins for 1.4 and 2.0?
>> Or do you want them to work with both versions?
> 
> good question! i expect that contrib pack 1.3.3 will be the last one in the 
> 1.x series, and that the next release will be 2.x-only. if we find a 
> showstopper, and we absolutely need to cut another contrib pack release, we 
> can, but i don't plan to otherwise. (plus, most pyblosxom users tend to be 
> comfortable with svn, so we often just say to grab bug fixes directly from 
> there.)

I'm hoping that PyBlosxom will be backwards compatible enough that we 
can maintain one set of plugins that work for both PyBlosxom 1.4.x and 
PyBlosxom 2.0.  Take a look at the CHANGELOG file in trunk.  It has the 
ongoing list of changes that developers (i.e. people who write plugins) 
should be aware of.

/will

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/