Re: down with 2.0, up with 1.5

Michael Guntsche wrote:
> On Feb 16, 2009, at 5:29, will wrote:
>>
>> I want to switch gears, move trunk to experimental, copy PYBLOSXOM_1_4
>> (the 1.4 branch) to trunk, and start cherry picking the changes in
>> functional groupings.  This will result in a series of smaller and
>> focused releases starting with PyBlosxom 1.5.
> 
> Just my two cents. It would have been better to leave 2.0 in trunk and  
> work on a separate branch for the 1.x releases.
> 
> this would give:
> 
> trunk - 2.0devel unstable
> branch/stable - current stable
> tags/1.x.y - for the 1.x.y releases
> 
> Personally I will stick to experimental for now since me current setup  
> is running on an older 2.0 version and I want to keep it like that.

I thought about that, but I wanted to make sure the place that I put the 
old trunk code was obviously a place that wasn't going to be maintained 
going forward.  Experimental is now a dead branch.  The good parts of it 
will be factored into the new PyBlosxom trunk going forward.  The rest 
will continue to bitrot.

/will

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Open Source Business Conference (OSBC), March 24-25, 2009, San Francisco, CA
-OSBC tackles the biggest issue in open source: Open Sourcing the Enterprise
-Strategies to boost innovation and cut costs with open source participation
-Receive a $600 discount off the registration fee with the source code: SFAD
http://p.sf.net/sfu/XcvMzF8H