Re: Parser Fragility

"Sebastian Spaeth" <[email protected]> Tue, 04 May 2010 17:12:59 +0200
Newsgroups gmane.comp.web.pyblosxom.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 2010-05-04, will kahn-greene wrote:
> I think this looks ok but it'd be good to provide a test in the test
> suite for it.
> 
> So, if you want, you could push the test with the fix or alternatively,
> I can take some time to write a test.

I have never written a python unittest before, so I would appreciate
some support here, yes. If you write a test, I can push the fix and
verify that it works as intended.

It would be interesting to see what is needed for a new test.

> I should document that.  What happens is the second #tags value
> overrides the first--there's no multidict thing going on here.

Right, that would be good to have it documented somewhere.

Sebastian

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
Pyblosxom-devel mailing list
Pyblosxom-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pyblosxom-devel
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 197 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkvgOXwACgkQVYX1jMgnoGIC0wCfdO1EwEbZE9DhZKWzVd2+wzgs
ACoAn22Uygk6YC5SQH1AhuN5cPXERjjI
=bf4z
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----