Re: Parser Fragility
"Sebastian Spaeth" <[email protected]> Tue, 04 May 2010 17:12:59 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.pyblosxom.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 2010-05-04, will kahn-greene wrote: > I think this looks ok but it'd be good to provide a test in the test > suite for it. > > So, if you want, you could push the test with the fix or alternatively, > I can take some time to write a test. I have never written a python unittest before, so I would appreciate some support here, yes. If you write a test, I can push the fix and verify that it works as intended. It would be interesting to see what is needed for a new test. > I should document that. What happens is the second #tags value > overrides the first--there's no multidict thing going on here. Right, that would be good to have it documented somewhere. Sebastian ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Pyblosxom-devel mailing list Pyblosxom-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pyblosxom-devel
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 197 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkvgOXwACgkQVYX1jMgnoGIC0wCfdO1EwEbZE9DhZKWzVd2+wzgs ACoAn22Uygk6YC5SQH1AhuN5cPXERjjI =bf4z -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----