Re: All links to / screenshots of flavours are broken

I updated the links to thumbnails and .tar.gz files for flavours in the
registry.

Additionally, I added a note about how the flavours probably need updating.

For flavours that are contributed from other
non-Ryan/non-me/non-other-people-on-this-list, we should ditch them and
add new flavours.

Also, I've got copies of the .tar.gz files on bluesock.  It's possible
that whoever created the flavour in the first place has newer versions
of the flavour.  So that might be a good option for updating the
flavour, too.

If someone(s) could take a look at these and update them, that'd be
really great.  If no one gets to it in a couple of weeks, I'll probably
take them all down and we can start over with new flavours.

/will


On 10/04/2010 09:05 AM, Asheesh Laroia wrote:
> On Mon, 4 Oct 2010, will kahn-greene wrote:
> 
>> Oh, whoops.  I thought the original author was saying that the 
>> screenshot links were pointing to SourceForge and were thus broken.  I 
>> didn't realize this applied to the .tar.gz files, too--missed that part. 
>> Sorry about that.  I blame it on being on a cramped bus at the time.
>>
>> I'll try to fix the links so that the flavours can be updated today. 
>> If I can't get to it today, then I'll get to it as late as next week. 
>> I'm about to fly out on another trip and I have no idea if I'll be able 
>> to connect to the Internet for the next week.
> 
> Yay!
> 
> -- Asheesh.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Virtualization is moving to the mainstream and overtaking non-virtualized
environment for deploying applications. Does it make network security 
easier or more difficult to achieve? Read this whitepaper to separate the 
two and get a better understanding.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/hp-phase2-d2d