Re: Shouldn't the debug renderer be a flavour?
will guaraldi <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.pyblosxom.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Fri, 25 Feb 2005, Russell Nelson wrote: > will guaraldi writes: > > If that's not correct, can you be more specific? Perhaps show an example > > of what you mean? > > http://blog.russnelson.com/?flav=documentation Ok. That's what I thought you were asking for. The debug renderer shows all that information. So for now I think you should use that even though it doesn't render it in pretty html output. I'm against having something in PyBlosxom that by default allows people to see this kind of information because it involves file paths and other information the user may not want to be showing to the world. I'd be more inclined to do this in a separate plugin that must be explicitly installed. To build such a beast, you could take the existing debug renderer, html-ize the output, and remove the data that you're not interested in seeing. Hope that helps-- /will ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click