Re: 'Static' files as in pystaticfile.py plugin
"Will Guaraldi" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.pyblosxom.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 6/13/07, Will Guaraldi <[email protected]> wrote: > I like fixed best so far, but I'm not wild about it. I had named it > "static" as in "static" vs. "dynamic". The files that pystaticfile > handles are files with content that's on your site that isn't > blog-related. So it's content that's not associated with a date--it's > static, undated, ... > > Maybe errata is an interesting word? It covers all the things that > aren't blog-like. I thought about it and changed the behavior of pystaticfile so that it's more wiki-like. It seems silly that it only serves static entries and doesn't connect them together (a la wiki-like linking) and doesn't allow you to have a directory tree of these static entries. So I decided to build a wbgwiki plugin. It's a "wiki" in the sense that links can be added using wiki-like linking [[topic]] and [[topic | description]]. It doesn't maintain versions, doesn't allow you to edit files over the web, and it doesn't allow for collaborative editing--so in those senses it is not a wiki. http://bluesock.org/~willg/cgi-bin/pybltrac.cgi/wiki/wbgwiki Any thoughts on the naming? Is "wbgwiki" too much? /will ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/