Re: mediawiki?
Asheesh Laroia <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.pyblosxom.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Wed, 29 Aug 2007, Will Guaraldi wrote: > Would it be better if we switched the PyBlosxom site over to use > MediaWiki or some similar database-driven thing? Did anything come of the web-editable pyblosxom project? That would be nicer in a dogfood sense. > Any thoughts on that? In principle, I agree with taking load off you. I defer to your choice on this matter, and whatever we switch to that's more participatory, it'll be an improvement. That said, I'd like to place a firm vote against MoinMoin. MediaWiki is faster, more widely-used, just as widely-used in Free Software projects (pick a random GNOME project like TomBoy or Beagle or F-Spot, its site is probably in MW). People know the syntax. Plus its anti-spam features are great (just use recaptcha.net's plugin). (It's just a vote, though, and I don't even know if my vote counts.) -- Asheesh. -- quark: The sound made by a well bred duck. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/