Re: planetpyblosxom

will guaraldi <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.web.pyblosxom.user
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Tue, 4 Jan 2005, Russell Nelson wrote:
> will guaraldi writes:
> >
> > Out of curiosity, now that I've moved most of the actual content over 
> > to http://pyblosxom.sourceforge.net/, does anyone find PlanetPyBlosxom 
> > useful?  The domain is set to expire in March and I'm tossing around 
> > letting it expire.
>
> I think that people are mostly used to the idea that planetWHATEVER will 
> be under the name planet.WHATEVER, e.g. planet.gnome.org, or 
> planet.cosi.clarkson.edu.

Hrm.  Let me clarify and expand a bit....  I've moved the documentation, 
registry, and flavour stuff that was on PlanetPyBlosxom over to 
http://pyblosxom.sourceforge.net/ -- none of this has anything to do with 
what you typically find on a planet site.

I'm asking if the remaining pieces on PlanetPyBlosxom are useful to 
anyone.  Theoretically it's now just an aggregation of PyBlosxom-related 
sites.  But...  there aren't many people in the feed subscriptions and 
most of the content has nothing to do with PyBlosxom.  So PlanetPyBlosxom 
doesn't exactly talk about PyBlosxom much.

I'm wondering if there exist people out there who think it is useful in 
its current form and actually use it.  I don't really need to know the 
general case--I want to know the actual reality of whether people use it 
and for what.

/will


-------------------------------------------------------
The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues
Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek.
It's fun and FREE -- well, almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.