RE: SQL to XQuery translation

Murali Mani <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.web.query-languages
Message-ID <[email protected]>

Michael,

Some questions regarding Query Language translations propped up recently.
This was one that we could not answer..

When you do XQuery -> SQL, how do you translate predicates?

a predicate in XPath such as

path [predicate]/ ...

we need existential semantics over a potential result set.. does this get
translated to a subquery in SQL???

best, murali.

-------------------------

Note: for SQL -> XQuery might be easier (if we consider simple queries)..

for example,
SELECT <Arr1>
FROM <Arr2>
WHERE <Arr3>

can be translated to (the way we teach SQL semantics in DB I ..)

for <Arr2'>
where <Arr3'>
return <Arr1'>

i think it is not difficult to translate these Arr2 -> Arr2' etc..?? Are
there things that I am overlooking??

On Thu, 15 Jan 2004, Michael Rys wrote:

> Some reasons why there is not much done in this area:
>
> 1. SQL is not powerful enough alone to query true XML data where mixed
> content, order, changing structure really matters. You would have to
> extend SQL fundamentally to allow this. There is some work going on at
> the relational database companies and the ANSI/ISO standards level.
> However, the focus there is mainly to leverage XPath and XQuery in the
> context of SQL expressions. So mapping SQL to XQuery would also mean
> that you define  relational semantics over the XML data, which you
> cannot easily do for general XML documents (see the discussions of
> edge/node-tables to represent XML relationally for some of the
> complexity).
>
> 2. In order to query relational data marked up in XML, most commercial
> systems provide a mapping level into XML (annotated schemata in SQL
> Server 2000, XSD-based OR mapping in Oracle 9i, DADs in IBM DB2) and
> then just let you use SQL to query it. So no need to map it to XQuery
> since the primary implementation architecture is SQL.
>
> If it would have been easy, I guess we would not have invested into
> XQuery in the first place but just defined a relational semantics on XML
> and be done with it...
>
> Best regards
> Michael
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf
> Of
> > David Song
> > Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2004 11:39 PM
> > To: [email protected]
> > Subject: SQL to XQuery translation
> >
> >
> > I am in need of researching, designing, and
> > implementing techniques to translate from SQL to
> > XQuery.  Most (if not all) research has been focused
> > on XQuery->SQL, now I need the reverse!  I believe is
> > challenge is how to map SQL predicates into XPath
> > expressions.  SQL joins is another challenge.
> >
> > The business usage case is that users need to be able
> > to construct AdHoc queries using SQL to query XML data
> > residing in native XML database.  I need help in
> > designing algorithms to map SQL to XQuery/XPath.  I
> > have not found any research in this area.
> >
> > I very much appreciate if anyone can point me in the
> > right direction.  I have some preliminary design
> > thoughts if anyone is interested in a more detailed
> > discussion with me.  Thanks!
> >
> > David Song
> > College of Engineering
> > San Jose State University
> >
> > __________________________________
> > Do you Yahoo!?
> > Yahoo! Hotjobs: Enter the "Signing Bonus" Sweepstakes
> > http://hotjobs.sweepstakes.yahoo.com/signingbonus
> >
>
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.