RE: Ancestors and siblings
"Michael Rys" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.query-languages |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <EB0A327048144442AFB15FCE18DC96C702FE6867@RED-MSG-31.redmond.corp.microsoft.com> |
No problem. Michael's book had to be finalized slightly before the last call was published. So some of the last minute changes did not make it. I am sure he will update this in the next version. Best regards Michael > -----Original Message----- > From: Donald Spaeth [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2004 1:13 PM > To: Michael Rys; [email protected] > Subject: Re: Ancestors and siblings > > Michael, > My source was Michael Brundage's new book on XQuery, pp. 68-69. However, > I > had not appreciated the finer points of the distinction between XQuery 1.0 > and XPath 2.0, and XQuery was my main concern. In any case, I am glad to > learn that they aren't as gone as I had feared. Thanks to Jan for the > pointer to full-axis feature. > > Cheers, > Don > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Michael Rys" <[email protected]> > To: "Donald Spaeth" <[email protected]>; <> > Sent: Monday, May 24, 2004 3:19 PM > Subject: RE: Ancestors and siblings > > > XPath 2.0 still has them and for XQuery they have been added as optional > in the last call draft. Why do you think they are gone? > > Best regards > Michael >