Re: interoperable implementations of XQuery

Michael Kay wrote:
>>Needs to be de-institutionalized, then.   It's not just a 
>>"strange" use, it's just plain wrong.
> 
> Yes, but how do you get any organization to abandon its jargon?

Start with the process document [1], which uses the word 'interoperable' 
throughout.

As long as the process document uses the term that way, those of us who 
must comply with it are likely to use the term that way.

Jonathan

[1]http://www.w3.org/2004/02/Process-20040205/process.html