Re: Variable references in path expressions

I've submitted as http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=1278

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Michael Kay" <[email protected]>
To: "'Henry Luo'" <[email protected]>; "'Xavier Franc'"
<[email protected]>; <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2005 6:07 PM
Subject: RE: Variable references in path expressions


> > Personally I would strongly suggest either no atomic values
> > to returned in
> > path expression or atomic values to returned in any step of the path.
> > The middle way is not a good choice.
>
> As I've mentioned before, if you want the WG to address this comment then
> you need to raise it as a last call comment on the spec: see the status
> section of the spec for instructions on how to do this.
>
> Michael Kay
>
>
>