Re: Thoughts on a block-syntax extension to PTL

On 9/4/05, Ksenia Marasanova <[email protected]> wrote:
> Graham,
> 
> I like it a lot.
> 
> 2005/8/22, Graham Fawcett <[email protected]>:
> [snip]
> >     * the expression in an ePTL opening-line should resolve to either an
> >       object that has methods 'open_block' and 'close_block', or it must
> >       be a string; if not, str() will be used to stringify it.
> 
> It should be unicode(). I didn't use PTL for a long time, but it
> supports unicode now, right?

Thanks. Actually, I'm going to change the above statement to, "the
expression must resolve to an object that has methods 'open_block' and
'close_block'". In other words, the designer of the tag-class can
decide what to return (though it would probably be a htmltext object).

Graham