Re: ContactAdmin misnomer?

On Oct 7, 2005, at 8:04 PM, David Binger wrote:
> Roger and I have, however, just completed a revision of the permission
> representation that eliminates the Admin classes completely.
> Permissions are still "granted" to users by other objects, but the
> record of granted permissions is kept on the user objects themselves,
> rather than on the other, PermissionManager, instances.
> We've eliminated completely the "indirect" permissions (such as
> A grants 'foo' to B if C grants 'boo' to B) because these
> seem to confuse people and are seldom used on our applications.
> The Permission editing UI is much easier to understand now.
>
> I expect that we will release this pretty soon, especially
> if others are interested in it.  We'll include the function
> we used to convert our databases to the revised representation.

How does it handle permissions that depend on other things, such as 
whether a user has subscribed for a given service and that subscription 
has not yet run out?

I'd be interested to understand how you have modeled it now. I do not 
need any conversion utilities... looking at the code (and examples... 
;-) would be very much appreciated.

mario