SCGIMount and SCGIHandler
Matt Patterson <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.quixote.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
It just occurred to me that I could use SCGIHandler / SCGIServer in a LocationMatch directive to allow Apache to continue to serve some top- level directories (my app mounts at /), which I couldn't do with SCGIMount, because you can only use it in a server context. I'm quite pleased that I've been able to avoid a needless (it seemed to me) use of StaticDirectory, but I'm a little worried that avoiding SCGIMount is a Bad Thing. Is it? Will I be caught out by a future version of mod_scgi, or is the SCGIServer / SCGIHandler combo going to remain for those of us who wish to exploit apache? Thanks, Matt -- Matt Patterson | Design & Code <matt at emdash co uk> | http://www.emdash.co.uk/ <matt at reprocessed org> | http://www.reprocessed.org/