RE: Re: Is this list still active? State of Quixote?
"Orr, Steve" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.quixote.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <E418CEC8B5FB3E48B30FA22F092886E70252D3D4@RNT-BOZ-0201.corp.rightnow.com> |
> As we know, there have only 42 files of Qx(ver 2.4) And since 42 is the answer to all things we should keep it that way. Galactic Hitchhiker ________________________________ From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Xiaoli Wang Sent: Tuesday, March 07, 2006 7:57 PM To: [email protected] Subject: [Quixote-users] Re: Is this list still active? State of Quixote? I am happy with Qx too, very easy to use,great and light architecture. I have tried Django,it's more complex than Qx, and have a higher learning cost. As we know, there have only 42 files of Qx(ver 2.4) in our Python Lib,how about Django? More than 200 files !!! Anyway, I dislike Django that's one step solution or all in one. Of course, Qx needs a tutorial just like Django did. :) -- XiaoLi Wang ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Email:[email protected] Or: [email protected] ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ _______________________________________________ Quixote-users mailing list [email protected] http://mail.mems-exchange.org/mailman/listinfo/quixote-users