Re: Quixote, WSGI, next-gen hypishness, etc

On Mar 9, 2006, at 5:34 PM, Ian Bicking wrote:

> WSGI is an in-process protocol, SCGI is really only an interprocess  
> protocol.

Well I guess SCGI really doesn't care whether it is in-process or  
not, but I
see what you are saying.

> So with WSGI you can compose applications inside a single process,  
> wrap applications (e.g., impose a transaction boundary or catch  
> exceptions), run tests in a simulated environment, or even do the  
> URL traversal as a series of WSGI requests.

This seems to boil down to the variations of the first point, that  
you can compose
applications, in-process, using WSGI.  I'm still trying to figure out  
why I need that.