Re: Quixote, WSGI, next-gen hypishness, etc

On Mar 9, 2006, at 6:13 PM, Titus Brown wrote:

> It's not clear that *you* need it.  Other people seem to *want* it,
> however.  So,
>
> 	Will Quixote, in the future, move only in directions that are
> 	primarily useful to mems-exchange?
>
> I don't want to be combative, I'm truly curious ;).

Quixote development has always been motivated primarily by
the interests of the MEMS Exchange.  Our business has never  been,
and will probably never be, web framework development, or
coordinating open source projects.  That would be fun, but
that's not our business.

I know you have a reasonable wish list for Quixote, and I
appreciate your willingness to work on it.  I simply am not
free to open up Quixote development like you want, even
though I would like to do just that.

If we come up with some kind of plan for future Quixote
development, we'll share it here.  I hope we can find a
way to take advantage of your energy.