Re: [foaf-dev] FOAF site - unscheduled downtime
Kingsley Idehen <kidehen-HpHEqLDO2a7UEDaH6ef/[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.rdfweb |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 9/17/10 9:29 AM, Henry Story wrote: > On 17 Sep 2010, at 13:02, Kingsley Idehen wrote: > >> On 9/17/10 7:03 AM, Henry Story wrote: >>> On 17 Sep 2010, at 00:07, Dan Brickley wrote: >>> >>> >>>> I've disabled wiki.foaf-project.org for now. When it comes back up, >>>> I'll make it 'read only' except for those of us in FOAF club. Quite >>>> how we define that I'm open to suggestions. But first rule of FOAF >>>> club - don't be a spammer! Everything else is a nice extra. I think >>>> it's time to eat our own dogfood here, so I'll be revisiting >>>> >>>> http://danbri.org/words/2009/10/25/504 >>>> and looking around for other >>>> sources of trusted openids and webids too. >>>> >>> Just WebID enable it. By the time spammers catch onto WebID you'll >>> have a couple of years of peace :-) >>> >>> Henry >>> >>> Social Web Architect >>> >>> http://bblfish.net/ >>> >> Henry, >> >> I don't think spammers can really do anything about WebID. I need an example of how they could thwart it etc.. > Well I mean that initially one could just allow people access who have a WebID, without even > looking at their Social Network. If they have a WebID at this point, and for the next year or > so you are guaranteed that they are intelligent and ahead of their time, which spammers tend > not to be. > > At that point adding policies will of course be necessary, and should in fact be developed > before. > >> My mission is to kill SPAM, completely, so I am eager to be presented with scenarios Spammers could exploit. Note, I assume a world where policies complement WebID . > Completely agree: you need policies to complement WebID as it at it's core only gives you a URI. > But at least you have that URI securely, and reliably. Yes, I am completing tests re. killing email spam using WebID, and I am having a lot of fun with very good results :-) Basically, I can apply trust factors to my filters starting with the most basic: is this Identity verifiable via WebID. The only challenge is a use pattern that makes everyone get a WebID with email signing in mind etc.. Mechanically, and already proven in my tests, this is one severe blow for Spam-Kind :-) -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen President& CEO OpenLink Software Web: http://www.openlinksw.com Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen Twitter/Identi.ca: kidehen