Re: [foaf-dev] FOAF site - unscheduled downtime

Kingsley Idehen <kidehen-HpHEqLDO2a7UEDaH6ef/[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.web.rdfweb
Message-ID <[email protected]>
  On 9/17/10 9:29 AM, Henry Story wrote:
> On 17 Sep 2010, at 13:02, Kingsley Idehen wrote:
>
>> On 9/17/10 7:03 AM, Henry Story wrote:
>>> On 17 Sep 2010, at 00:07, Dan Brickley wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> I've disabled wiki.foaf-project.org for now. When it comes back up,
>>>> I'll make it 'read only' except for those of us in FOAF club. Quite
>>>> how we define that I'm open to suggestions. But first rule of FOAF
>>>> club - don't be a spammer! Everything else is a nice extra. I think
>>>> it's time to eat our own dogfood here, so I'll be revisiting
>>>>
>>>> http://danbri.org/words/2009/10/25/504
>>>>   and looking around for other
>>>> sources of trusted openids and webids too.
>>>>
>>> Just WebID enable it. By the time spammers catch onto WebID you'll
>>> have a couple of years of peace :-)
>>>
>>> Henry
>>>
>>> Social Web Architect
>>>
>>> http://bblfish.net/
>>>
>> Henry,
>>
>> I don't think spammers can really do anything about WebID. I need an example of how they could thwart it etc..
> Well I mean that initially one could just allow people access who have a WebID, without even
> looking at their Social Network. If they have a WebID at this point, and for the next year or
> so you are guaranteed that they are intelligent and ahead of their time, which spammers tend
> not to be.
>
> At that point adding policies will of course be necessary, and should in fact be developed
> before.
>
>> My mission is to kill SPAM, completely, so I am eager to be presented with scenarios Spammers could exploit. Note, I assume a world where policies complement WebID .
> Completely agree: you need policies to complement WebID as it at it's core only gives you a URI.
> But at least you have that URI securely, and reliably.

Yes, I am completing tests re. killing email spam using WebID, and I am 
having a lot of fun with very good results :-)

Basically, I can apply trust factors to my filters starting with the 
most basic: is this Identity verifiable via WebID.

The only challenge is a use pattern that makes everyone get a WebID with 
email signing in mind etc..

Mechanically, and already proven in my tests, this is one severe blow 
for Spam-Kind :-)


-- 

Regards,

Kingsley Idehen	
President&  CEO
OpenLink Software
Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
Twitter/Identi.ca: kidehen
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.