Re: [foaf-dev] announce: F2F MediaWiki extension - pre-alpha OpenID trust group RDFa exporter

Akbar Hossain <mail-XdMj/[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.web.rdfweb
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi Dan,

Thanks for progressing this! Having previously run a small wiki which was
spammed to death - and eventually having to shut it down I know from
personal experience the need is there!

A few random thoughts when I thought about similar things.

I naively think about http://wiki.foaf-project.org as being an agent of
sorts and the list of account on the wiki as a list of agents it "knows".
These agents in turn can say they "know" http://wiki.foaf-project.org . I
think the sematics of the above are not allowed in the current ontology this
directly but I would be tempted to add an rdf:about to each agent in
http://wiki.foaf-project.org/w/Special:F2F to the account page that each
user has on the wiki. In my case
http://wiki.foaf-project.org/w/User:Akbarhossain.com . I could then add an
entry into my foaf file to my account on the wiki. So
http://wiki.foaf-project.org say is "knows" my openid http:\\
akbarhossain.com and i say i know http://wiki.foaf-project.org in my foaf
file via my account http://wiki.foaf-project.org/w/User:Akbarhossain.com

I think ideally http://wiki.foaf-project.org/w/User:Akbarhossain.com would
have an entry saying it is a member of this group
http://wiki.foaf-project.org/w/Special:F2F#!aActiveOpenIDTrustGroup.

I would also be tempted to add some entries into  the
http://wiki.foaf-project.org/w/Special:F2F to express the ACL of the wiki.

I guess eventually I could see a scenario where perhaps openids you accept
for comments on  your blog http://danbri.org/words/2009/12/29/523 are
members of the ACL with editing rights automatically for example.

Thanks



On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 10:54 AM, Dan Brickley <[email protected]> wrote:

> ==Background==
>
>  * public facing, open Wikis are being spammed heavily. Information
> in the wiki is either damaged by spam/malware attacks, or locked away
> in read-only mode, making community contributions needlessly
> difficult. Many such wikis exist and have overlapping communities of
> contributors and potential contributors. Spam techniques are
> increasingly subtle, and machine filtering is proving inadequate. It
> is difficult for admins of a wiki to know who they can trust with
> write access, if they want to maximise contributions to their content
> and at the same time, take care to protect those contributions from
> vandalism. If a wiki is left open to the public, it will be
> vandalised. If it is made editable only by a small group, it will
> often fail to reach its full potential. This is unfortunate.
>
>  * This situation causes a trend towards centralisation - both in
> terms of culture/content (people simply use Wikipedia and other large
> sites), but also in terms of identity technology ('comment with your
> twitter / facebook id', etc.) which can exclude users who choose not
> to use the market-leader sites. Both aspects threaten the diversity
> and pluralism that make the Web interesting.
>
>  * Many users increasingly have access to openids (and via eg.
> openid4.me, from webid too).
>
>  * Recent MediaWiki releases makes it easier for wiki pages to be
> automatically generated with machine-readable markup RDFa).
>
> ==Overview==
>
>  * This is an experiment in sharing trust-related metadata about
> people's login-capable Web identifiers - homepages, blogs etc that are
> wired up to OpenID.
>  * Wikis and blogs can both produce and consume this kind of data.
> Every time you accept a comment into your blog or wiki, and that
> comment was made by OpenID, you are accumulating evidence that people
> can use when deciding whether to trust that OpenID elsewhere.
>  * F2F exporters are simple addons for blogs and wikis that (with some
> tweaking/customisation) can publish descriptions of the groups of
> openids known to some software installation
>
> ==Status==
>
> Previously...
>
> * from 2009 http://danbri.org/words/2009/10/25/504 'Syndicating trust?
> Mediawiki, Wordpress and OpenID' initial writeup
> * http://danbri.org/words/2009/12/29/523 'WordPress trust syndication
> revisited: F2F plugin'
> * Mediawiki notes http://wiki.foaf-project.org/w/DanBri/MediawikiOpenid
>
> There is already a basic exporter for Wordpress. Today I got same
> working for MediaWiki (thanks to mhausenblas, presbrey in irc for
> help!)
>
> This is pretty rough still, but I hope it gives others some basic
> pieces to build upon.
>
> Sample installation: http://wiki.foaf-project.org/w/Special:F2F (gives
> an RDFa page describing some trusted openids)
>
> Source code: check out F2F/ from
> http://svn.foaf-project.org/foaftown/2010/mediawiki/extensions/F2F/
> subversion into your MediaWiki extensions/ dir.
>
> See
> http://svn.foaf-project.org/foaftown/2010/mediawiki/extensions/F2F/F2F_body.php
> for the SQL, which needs tweaking/customising. Please read the
> code before installing this in a live site, it is very much
> experimental work in progress. I won't list all limitations here; you
> can see from the code link that there is not a lot to this yet, beyond
> the raw idea. In particular it doesn't distinguish between the groups
> some account/openid is in, nor provide any information for consuming
> data.
>
> So anyway - the idea is that if we can get a few such installations
> running, they can syndicate useful/trusted openid lists back into the
> wider community.
>
> For example, the FOAF wiki already takes a feed of openids from my
> blog, so that commenters accepted as non-spammers in the blog are put
> into a group in the mediawiki. Since the FOAF wiki edit list is now
> locked down to known/trusted openids only, I am interested in finding
> ways of broadening that list without too much manual effort. I am sure
> other Wiki admins are in a similar situation.
>
> Research topic: how to avoid loops in the trust graph :) If
> wiki.foaf-project.org and (say) a Dublin Core wiki both produce and
> consume these lists, how to distinguish in the data which groups are
> populated based on external evidence, and which from first-hand
> knowledge?
>
> thanks for any thoughts,
>
> Dan
> _______________________________________________
> foaf-dev mailing list
> foaf-dev-RyYwo1q5J+qsOXdr9/[email protected]
> http://lists.foaf-project.org/mailman/listinfo/foaf-dev
>

_______________________________________________
foaf-dev mailing list
foaf-dev-RyYwo1q5J+qsOXdr9/[email protected]
http://lists.foaf-project.org/mailman/listinfo/foaf-dev
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.