Re: [foaf-dev] No name for agents or groups?

Hi Dan,

Am 05.03.2011 20:24, schrieb Dan Brickley:
> On 5 March 2011 20:19, Bob Ferris<zazi-o0kiOr3Ba/[email protected]>  wrote:
>
>> Yes, but currently there is no such sub class relation of foaf:Agent to
>> rdfs:Resource (or at least, as it is more common for OWL-based
>> ontologies, foaf:Agent to owl:Thing) in the FOAF ontology specification ;)
>
> Those are implied by using RDF. Detail might vary depending on whether
> you're a DL believer or not, but everything's an rdfs:Resource and
> owl:Thing. Even if you don't bother saying so...

Oh, sorry. I wasn't really aware of these entailment rules for some reason.

>
>> Regarding SpecGen, I would suggest the extension I made up on your
>> SpecGen version, danbri ;) (see [1]). It has proper RDFa and generates
>> further relations of the ontology specifications.
>> On the other side, it might be good to provide an overview graphic of
>> the ontology, and maybe, if needed, further graphics that describe more
>> in detail parts of the ontology, too.
>> (I tried to do this for every SMI ontology ;), see [3] or a concrete
>> example [4].)
>
> Sounds good. There are quite a few forks of SpecGen floating around.
> At some point it might make sense to flip things around and have the
> HTML version be the master rather than the RDF/XML.... perhaps
> integrated via http://dev.w3.org/2009/dap/ReSpec.js/documentation.html
> ?

Thanks for the pointer to ReSpec.js. Looks quite interesting. I thinks, 
it's more important that the different serializations are synchronous, or?

Cheers,


Bob