Re: [foaf-dev] Vocabulary for sexual relations?
Henry Story <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.rdfweb |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
You will have succeeded if you can encode the diagrams shown here http://www.informationisbeautiful.net/2010/the-varieties-of-intimate-relationship/ On 7 May 2011, at 15:57, B.K. DeLong wrote: > Use the relationships vocabulary as a model and go to sites like > fetlife.com which probably lists every such relationship possible and > is ripe to have such foaf vocabs. > > On 5/7/11, Nils Dagsson Moskopp <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hello FOAF developers, >> >> >> I am currently working on a project involving social graphs of sexual >> relations. My spider-sense suggests it could be a good idea to use a >> known vocabulary instead of inventing my own. However, I found >> <http://vocab.org/relationship/> to contain social, but not sexual >> relations. >> >> Is there a vocabulary involving sexual relations for use with FOAF? If >> not, should I extend an existing vocabulary or create a new one? How? >> >> >> Greetings, >> -- >> Nils Dagsson Moskopp // erlehmann >> <http://dieweltistgarnichtso.net> >> > > -- > Sent from my mobile device > > B.K. DeLong (K3GRN) > [email protected] > +1.617.797.8471 > > http://www.iansresearch.com Work. > http://bkdelong.livejournal.com Life. > <http://www.pmrp.org>http://twitter.com/bkdelong Tweet. > _______________________________________________ > foaf-dev mailing list > foaf-dev-RyYwo1q5J+qsOXdr9/[email protected] > http://lists.foaf-project.org/mailman/listinfo/foaf-dev Social Web Architect http://bblfish.net/