[foaf-dev] Vocabulary for Genealogy/Family Tree Information

Hello all,
        I guess the relationship vocabulary could work for Genealogy
information but does anyone know of any other actively used vocabularies for
Genealogy information?  I did see some that was discussed a few years ago.
So, I wonder if in the meantime a common vocabulary has been developed or
agreed upon.
Thanks,
Bruce


-----Original Message-----
From: foaf-dev-bounces-RyYwo1q5J+qsOXdr9/[email protected]
[mailto:foaf-dev-bounces-RyYwo1q5J+qsOXdr9/[email protected]] On Behalf Of Bruce Whealton
Sent: Saturday, May 07, 2011 6:29 PM
To: [email protected]; 'Nils Dagsson Moskopp';
foaf-dev-RyYwo1q5J+qsOXdr9/[email protected]
Subject: Re: [foaf-dev] Vocabulary for sexual relations?

Hello all,
It's curious that they don't use the namespace relationship on the page or
in the vocabulary:
http://vocab.org/relationship/
Never mind, they suggest rel but do not use it on the page.  I'm a bit new
to this.  If the namespace is http://purl.org/vocab/relationship
why is it at: http://vocab.org/relationship/

I am working on a couple sites that could benefit from these vocabs.  One is
dealing with family history/genealogy... the other is an adult dating site.
I'd love to see some ideas as to how and where these vocabularies are used.
I started reading "Programming The Semantic Web" and hope that it will give
me some useful ideas. 
Thanks,
Bruce

-----Original Message-----
From: foaf-dev-bounces-RyYwo1q5J+qsOXdr9/[email protected]
[mailto:foaf-dev-bounces-RyYwo1q5J+qsOXdr9/[email protected]] On Behalf Of B.K. DeLong
Sent: Saturday, May 07, 2011 9:58 AM
To: Nils Dagsson Moskopp; foaf-dev-RyYwo1q5J+qsOXdr9/[email protected];
fickileaks-/[email protected]
Subject: Re: [foaf-dev] Vocabulary for sexual relations?

Use the relationships vocabulary as a model and go to sites like fetlife.com
which probably lists every such relationship possible and is ripe to have
such foaf vocabs.

On 5/7/11, Nils Dagsson Moskopp <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hello FOAF developers,
>
>
> I am currently working on a project involving social graphs of sexual 
> relations. My spider-sense suggests it could be a good idea to use a 
> known vocabulary instead of inventing my own. However, I found 
> <http://vocab.org/relationship/> to contain social, but not sexual 
> relations.
>
> Is there a vocabulary involving sexual relations for use with FOAF? If 
> not, should I extend an existing vocabulary or create a new one? How?
>
>
> Greetings,
> --
> Nils Dagsson Moskopp // erlehmann
> <http://dieweltistgarnichtso.net>
>

--
Sent from my mobile device

B.K. DeLong (K3GRN)
[email protected]
+1.617.797.8471

http://www.iansresearch.com       Work.
http://bkdelong.livejournal.com      Life.
<http://www.pmrp.org>http://twitter.com/bkdelong           Tweet.
_______________________________________________
foaf-dev mailing list
foaf-dev-RyYwo1q5J+qsOXdr9/[email protected]
http://lists.foaf-project.org/mailman/listinfo/foaf-dev

_______________________________________________
foaf-dev mailing list
foaf-dev-RyYwo1q5J+qsOXdr9/[email protected]
http://lists.foaf-project.org/mailman/listinfo/foaf-dev