Re: [foaf-dev] New FOAF properties
Bob Ferris <[email protected]> Sun, 11 Sep 2011 14:10:01 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.rdfweb |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Bruce, On 9/10/2011 9:28 AM, Bruce Whealton wrote: > Dan, > That was very detailed and very helpful. Thanks. > IMHO, I think we do need something for expressing resume type information. > It is good to have a foaf:interest but one also likes to express one's > skills. Yes, this is exactly the domain you can describe with the help of the Cognitive Characteristics Ontology [1], i.e., this vocabulary includes terms to describe cognitive patterns in a short way with the help of binary relations by utilising sub properties of cco:cognitive_characteristics [2], e.g., cco:skill [3]. If you like to describe cognitive characteristics more in detail, you can utilise the cco:CognitiveCharacteristics concept. Please have a look at the examples section [5] of the CCO documentation, e.g., the cognitive patterns example [6]. > I agree with what Bob was saying about CV that the skills, > experience and etc. should be related to a foaf:Person. A person has > certain skills and experience, not the document about them. Cool! ;) > I found DOAC - description of a career but that wasn't used too often either > and was a bit awkward. > The only other thing I was thinking about on the foaf:interest is that a > dc:title should be included to provide a readable result for SPARQL queries. Yep, this is always a good knowledge representation practise (to locally include a human-readable label of an utilised, external information resource). > Many profiles, that I've seen do use the dc:title attribute, though. > I don't know why CV references FOAF at the bottom of it's description page > but does not ever use any foaf classes or properties. > > I was reading a recent book on SPARQL and the author uses foaf often for an > address book. I guess that is a good idea for using foaf. I thought it > would be helpful to keep track of all the different places where I have > accounts, blogs, wikis, etc. etc. Yep. Cheers, Bo [1] http://purl.org/ontology/cco/core# [2] http://purl.org/ontology/cco/core#cognitive_characteristic [3] http://purl.org/ontology/cco/core#skill [4] http://purl.org/ontology/cco/core#CognitiveCharacteristic [5] http://purl.org/ontology/cco/cognitivecharacteristics.html#sec-example [6] http://purl.org/ontology/cco/cognitivecharacteristics.html#sec-cognitive-patterns-example