Re: [foaf-dev] are these files valid FOAF?
Christian Ledermann <[email protected]> Mon, 23 Apr 2012 17:23:42 +0300
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.rdfweb |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CABCjzWpAhB1u7NHqh6w5U87f3Wmycp+BYLbMuuM+UP+ku1Phtw@mail.gmail.com> |
I added a foaf document describing the contact database as a whole: http://iwlearn.net/con-info/contacts/@@foaf.rdf this returns only basic information about the relationship between organizations and persons. It should serve as an entry point for scutters. Has somebody on this list a sutter handy to test my assumption that this works and yields reasonable results? the 'real' information is in the person and organization documents e.g: http://iwlearn.net/con-info/contacts/mxmcontactsorganization.20050928Z122513.155/foaf.rdf http://iwlearn.net/con-info/contacts/mr.-anjan-kumar-datta/@@foaf.rdf On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 12:22 PM, Michael Haschke <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > >> any thoughts about: >> persons -> projects > > foaf:currentProject and foaf:pastProject right, this gives me also a bit more information about the project status on the persons profile. currently the Projects rdf returns a 404, this is to be fixed in the next days I think that a project can be more effectively expressed for my purposes with: ===================== http://www.epimorphics.com/public/vocabulary/org.html Class: org:OrganizationalCollaboration (subClassOf org:Organization) A collaboration between two or more Organizations such as a project. It meets the criteria for being an Organization in that it has an identity and defining purpose independent of its particular members but is neither a formally recognized legal entity nor a sub-unit within some larger organization. Might typically have a shorter lifetime than the Organizations within it, but not necessarily. All members are org:Organizations rather than individuals and those Organizations can play particular roles within the venture. Alternative names: Project Venture Endeavour Consortium ====================== Pity is that org:OrganizationalCollaboration and foaf:Project are not compatible afaik ;( > > regards, > Haschek > _______________________________________________ > foaf-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.foaf-project.org/mailman/listinfo/foaf-dev -- Best Regards, Christian Ledermann Nairobi - Kenya Mobile : +254 702978914 <*)))>{ If you save the living environment, the biodiversity that we have left, you will also automatically save the physical environment, too. But If you only save the physical environment, you will ultimately lose both. 1) Don’t drive species to extinction 2) Don’t destroy a habitat that species rely on. 3) Don’t change the climate in ways that will result in the above. }<(((*> _______________________________________________ foaf-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.foaf-project.org/mailman/listinfo/foaf-dev