Re: [foaf-dev] Wishlists / requests for next rev of FOAF spec?
Bob Ferris <[email protected]> Tue, 12 Jun 2012 09:16:03 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.rdfweb |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi, On 06/03/2012 09:49 PM, Kjetil Kjernsmo wrote: > On Wednesday 30. May 2012 18.00.26 Dan Brickley wrote: >> Yeah, it's about time we shipped a new one. >> >> Anyone else got suggestions? > > I always wanted a foaf:personal_phone, which would be a subproperty of > foaf:phone and an IFP/key/or something. My phone number is probably one of > my strongest identifiers these days. > > Also, perhaps some terms should change status. I would suggest the > following upgraded to stable: > foaf:Document > foaf:Image > foaf:based_near > foaf:depiction > foaf:depicts > foaf:img > foaf:mbox_sha1sum > foaf:name > foaf:nick > foaf:page > foaf:phone > foaf:schoolHomepage > foaf:thumbnail > foaf:topic_interest > foaf:weblog > foaf:workplaceHomepage +1 for upgrading the majority of these terms to stable. However, I would exclude the homepage relations (foaf:schoolHomepage and foaf:workplaceHomepage), because one would rather link a workplace and/or school resource today (which can even have a more detailed description), or? Re. modelling the "like" relation, I would also suggest to have a look at the Association Ontology [1], whose approach was a bit different because it modelled the "like" relation from the object direction and which is a bit more verbose. Cheers, Bo [1] http://purl.org/ontology/ao/core#