Re: [foaf-dev] foaf robots as People?
Patrick Logan <[email protected]> Sun, 8 Mar 2015 16:27:02 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.rdfweb |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAD_aa-9xJ2vU+MKZQRsUb_4HdZiwi8cLkTyjeWcvym+NBO0RpQ@mail.gmail.com> |
--===============4591233997115470125== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1139157a429d030510cf41e7 --001a1139157a429d030510cf41e7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 In that case it would seem the spec, via "real or imaginary", gives room for that decision. My preference might be to use my own class for your purpose, and draw the line for Persons a little stricter. But I can see your point about that causing other complications, especially if you've no other reason to use your own namespace, classes, etc. On Mar 8, 2015 4:14 PM, "Melvin Carvalho" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On 9 March 2015 at 00:12, Patrick Logan <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> > Can I make them a Person? >> > >> >> In what ways would this make a difference to the systems or people >> working with the data? >> > > well im working on a social system with timelines, apps etc. Id like to > give the robot the same abilities as a person has, viewing, writing etc. > without having to change whole bunches of code. The easiest way to do this > would be to make the robot type Agent and Person ... is it too much a > stretch do you think? > > --001a1139157a429d030510cf41e7 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <p dir=3D"ltr">In that case it would seem the spec, via "real or imagi= nary", gives room for that decision. </p> <p dir=3D"ltr">My preference might be to use my own class for your purpose,= and draw the line for Persons a little stricter. But I can see your point = about that causing other complications, especially if you've no other r= eason to use your own namespace, classes, etc.</p> <div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Mar 8, 2015 4:14 PM, "Melvin Carvalho&qu= ot; <<a href=3D"mailto:[email protected]">[email protected]= m</a>> wrote:<br type=3D"attribution"><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" = style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><di= v dir=3D"ltr"><br><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote"= >On 9 March 2015 at 00:12, Patrick Logan <span dir=3D"ltr"><<a href=3D"m= ailto:[email protected]" target=3D"_blank">[email protected]</a= >></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 = 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span><p dir=3D"ltr">= ><br> > Can I make them a Person?<br> ></p> </span><p dir=3D"ltr">In what ways would this make a difference to the syst= ems or people working with the data?<br></p></blockquote><div><br></div><di= v>well im working on a social system with timelines, apps etc.=C2=A0 Id lik= e to give the robot the same abilities as a person has, viewing, writing et= c. without having to change whole bunches of code.=C2=A0 The easiest way to= do this would be to make the robot type Agent and Person ... is it too muc= h a stretch do you think? <br></div></div><br></div></div> </blockquote></div> --001a1139157a429d030510cf41e7-- --===============4591233997115470125== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ foaf-dev mailing list foaf-dev-RyYwo1q5J+qsOXdr9/[email protected] http://lists.foaf-project.org/mailman/listinfo/foaf-dev --===============4591233997115470125==--