ACTION: Arthur to look at CR098
Arthur Ryman <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.services.description |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <OF5DBCF188.CB4105BC-ON85257244.00105AAA-85257244.00126D1F@ca.ibm.com> |
In fulfillment of my action item [1] I gave looked at CR098 [2] which recommend that we not treat the following statement as an assertion [3]: Specifically components that the schema imports via xs:import are NOT referenceable.? This statement is weaker than the assertion [4] When resolving QNames references for schema definitions, the namespace MUST be imported by the referring WSDL 2.0 document. I agree that we should leave the sentence but remove the assertion markup. However, I also recommend that we correct the wording. A document imports namespaces, not components. I recommend the following wording which also spells things more explicitly: Note that components in the namespace that the inline schema imports via xs:import are not automatically referenceable from the WSDL 2.0 document that contains the inline schema. [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2006Dec/att-0032/20061207-ws-desc-minutes.html#action02 [2] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR098 [3] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/wsdl20/wsdl20.html?content-type=text/html;%20charset=utf-8#Types-1300002 [4] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/wsdl20/wsdl20.html?content-type=text/html;%20charset=utf-8#Types-1300001 Arthur Ryman, IBM Software Group, Rational Division blog: http://ryman.eclipsedevelopersjournal.com/ phone: +1-905-413-3077, TL 969-3077 assistant: +1-905-413-2411, TL 969-2411 fax: +1-905-413-4920, TL 969-4920 mobile: +1-416-939-5063, text: [email protected]